Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Rom J Ophthalmol ; 66(4): 344-351, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2205091

ABSTRACT

Objective: To study the demographic and clinical characteristics of childhood and adult onset vernal keratoconjunctivitis in a tertiary care center during Covid pandemic. Methods: A prospective, hospital-based study including a total of 135 patients with Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) studied from June 2021 to June 2022 in a tertiary care center in India. Results: Patients presented were in the age range of 1½ to 30 years old. Adult onset VKC included 10.4% of the total patients. The disease was found to be more common in males, with a male to female ratio of 2.5:1. Limbal VKC was the most common presentation found in 61.5% of the patients followed by palpebral type in 28.9% and mixed type in 10.4% of the patients. Severity wise moderate intermittent form of the disease was found to be the most common in 49.6% of the patients. Steroid induced glaucoma was found to be the most common complication in 8.89% of the patients, requiring regular monitoring of intraocular pressure and change in treatment regime, followed by shield ulcer in 2.96% and limbal stem cell deficiency and Keratoconus in 1.48%. Conclusion: This study represents the nature of Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis and its presentation in North India, showing regional variations in the presentation of the disease due to different environmental conditions and the variations in aggression in management protocol. It also emphasizes the regular monitoring of intraocular pressure and the supervision on rising Adult onset VKC.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Conjunctivitis, Allergic , Humans , Male , Adult , Female , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , Demography
2.
PLoS One ; 17(8): e0272808, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2002311

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic dry eye disease is a growing public health challenge especially among those who are visual display unit (VDU) users and other long-time near activity workers. Globally, computer user adults experience a surge in the prevalence of dry eye. Data is insufficient on the prevalence of dry eye disease among postgraduate students in Ethiopia. Therefore, the present was aimed to assess the prevalence of dry eye and its associated factors among postgraduate students at the University of Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 423 postgraduate students who were selected based on a simple random sampling technique. Data was collected through online symptom-based ocular surface disease index questionnaire. Binary logistic regression was used to test the association and p-value of <0.05 was considered to determine the significance of the association. RESULTS: From the total postgraduate students, 404 completed the study with a response rate of 95.5%. The prevalence of symptomatic dry eye disease was 50.5% (95% CI, 45.1%-54.9%). Average continuous visual display unit use for 2-4hours per day[AOR = 2.57 (95% CI, 1.27-5.21)] and for> 4hours per day[AOR = 3.77 (95% CI 1.87-7.59)], duration of visual display unit use for 3-5 years [AOR = 2.24 (95% CI, 1.17-4.31)], 6-8 years [AOR = 2.46 (95% CI,1.31-4.62)] and > 8 years [AOR = 3.25 (95% CI, 1.63-6.48)], average sleeping hour < 7 hours/day within last week [AOR = 2.17 (95% CI, 1.35-3.49)] and current known allergic conjunctivitis [AOR = 5.42 (95% CI, 2.43-12.10)] were significantly associated with symptomatic dry eye disease. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: In this study, about half of postgraduate students faced symptomatic dry eye disease. Significant association was observed between symptomatic dry eye disease and average continuous hours of visual display unit use, duration of visual display unit use in years, shortage of sleep and current known allergic conjunctivitis. It is advisable for postgraduate students to limit screen exposure hour and establish regular breaking time along their exposure. It is also advisable to have optimum sleep as possible. It is also important to explore dry eye disease on a large sample incorporating clinical tests.


Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis, Allergic , Dry Eye Syndromes , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dry Eye Syndromes/epidemiology , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Humans , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Students , Surveys and Questionnaires , Universities
3.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 10(7): 1889-1902.e9, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1921008

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Functional iron deficiency facilitates allergy development and amplifies the symptom burden in people experiencing allergies. Previously we selectively delivered micronutrients to immune cells with ß-lactoglobulin as carrier (holoBLG), resulting in immune resilience and allergy prevention. OBJECTIVE: The clinical efficacy of a food for special medical purposes-lozenge containing ß-lactoglobulin with iron, polyphenols, retinoic acid, and zinc (holoBLG lozenge) was assessed in allergic women. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study, grass- and/or birch pollen-allergic women (n = 51) were given holoBLG or placebo lozenges over 6 months. Before and after dietary supplementation, participants were nasally challenged and the blood was analyzed for immune and iron parameters. Daily symptoms, medications, pollen concentrations, and well-being were recorded by an electronic health application. RESULTS: Total nasal symptom score after nasal provocations improved by 42% in the holoBLG group versus 13% in the placebo group. The combined symptom medication score during the birch peak and entire season as well as the entire grass pollen season improved in allergic subjects supplemented with the holoBLG lozenge by 45%, 31%, and 40%, respectively, compared with the placebo arm. Participants ingesting the holoBLG lozenge had improved iron status with increased hematocrit values, decreased red cell distribution width, and higher iron levels in circulating CD14+ cells compared with the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted micronutrition with the holoBLG lozenge seemed to be effective in elevating the labile iron levels in immune cells and reducing the symptom burden in allergic women in this pilot study. The underlying allergen-independent mechanism provides evidence that dietary nutritional supplementation of the immune system is one of the ways to combat atopy.


Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis, Allergic , Hypersensitivity, Immediate , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal , Allergens , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Iron/therapeutic use , Lactoglobulins/therapeutic use , Pilot Projects , Poaceae , Tablets/therapeutic use
4.
Ital J Pediatr ; 48(1): 74, 2022 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1846855

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak pushed the Italian government to start a strict lockdown, replacing school attendance with long-distance learning. This caused reduced exposure to sunlight but increased exposure to screens. Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is a chronic inflammatory ocular condition in which exposure to light plays a cardinal role. We conducted an online survey to evaluate the impact of screen exposure on children with VKC during the COVID-19 lockdown. METHODS: We performed a survey-based observational study, asking patients followed at the Allergology clinics of Meyer Children's University Hospital in Florence and of Policlinico Umberto I in Rome to provide grading on 6 subjective ocular clinical manifestations presented during the lockdown and to give an estimate of their hours/day of screen exposure. RESULTS: Mean scores of signs and symptoms increased homogeneously when studying patients exposed to longer screen time. When comparing scores collected in 2019 to those in 2020, there was not a significant reduction in clinical manifestations, although the situation differed between the two centers due to geographical differences in sunlight exposure. CONCLUSION: During the lockdown, there was a reduction in sunlight exposure but conversely an increase in the time spent in front of screens that correlated with the worsening of VKC signs and symptoms in direct proportion to the hours/day of screen exposure. Our results also showed a statistically significant difference in the relative impact of long-distance learning on VKC clinical manifestations in the different Italian regions.


Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis, Allergic , Screen Time , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Child , Communicable Disease Control , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/epidemiology , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Pandemics , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Ital J Pediatr ; 48(1): 1, 2022 Jan 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1613246

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The role of allergic sensitization seems to be protective against SARS CoV2 infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate, using online surveys, the impact of COVID-19 on Italian allergic children, comparing the prevalence of AR and asthma symptoms between the first and second pandemic wave. METHODS: Both surveys were emailed to Italian pediatricians in April 2020 (first survey) and in March 2021 (second survey). The first one was related to the impact of COVID-19 and the most frequently reported symptoms. The second one was superimposed on the previous one, taking into account some additional aspects in the management of disease. RESULTS: A total of 99 pediatricians participated in the first survey and 267 in the second one. The first survey showed that, asthma and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis prevalence was mostly between 0 and 20% throughout the country. The second survey showed a lower prevalence of both diseases nationwide in comparison to the first one. Comparing the two surveys, statistically significant differences were reported only in the distribution of asthma prevalence in Southern Italy while no differences were highlighted in the North and in the Center. Finally regarding allergic rhinoconjunctivitis prevalence, no differences were noticed nationwide. CONCLUSIONS: Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma, if under control, did not represent risk factors for the susceptibility to SARS CoV2. Therefore, it is strongly recommended to continue therapies during COVID-19 outbreak, according to the international guidelines. However, being COVID-19 a new disease, actual knowledge will undergo continuous improvements over time.


Subject(s)
Asthma/epidemiology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/epidemiology , Rhinitis, Allergic/epidemiology , Asthma/complications , Child , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/complications , Humans , Italy , Prevalence , Rhinitis, Allergic/complications , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
researchsquare; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-877878.v1

ABSTRACT

Background: SARS-CoV-2 outbreak pushed the Italian government to start a strict lockdown, replacing school attendance with long-distance learning. This caused reduced exposure to sunlight but increased exposure to screens. Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) is a chronic inflammatory ocular condition in which exposure to light plays a cardinal role. We conducted an online survey to evaluate the impact of screen exposure in children with VKC during the lockdown. Methods We performed a survey-based observational study, asking patients followed at the Allergology of Meyer Children’s University Hospital in Florence and of Policlinico Umberto I in Rome to provide grading on 6 subjective ocular clinical manifestations presented during the lockdown and to give an estimate of the hours/day of screen exposure. Results Mean scores of signs and symptoms increased homogeneously when studying patients exposed to longer screen time. When comparing scores collected in 2019 versus 2020, there was not a significant reduction in clinical manifestations, although the situation differed between the two centres due to geographical differences in sunlight exposure. Conclusion During the lockdown, there was a reduction of sunlight exposure but conversely an increase in the time spent in front of screens that correlated with the worsening of VKC signs symptoms in direct proportion to the hours/day of screen exposure. Our results also showed a statistically significant difference in the relative impact of long-distance learning on VKC clinical manifestations in the different Italian regions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Conjunctivitis, Allergic
8.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 21(5): 500-506, 2021 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1315705

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To analyze if recommendations given before and during the COVID-19 pandemic are still a valid option for patients suffering of ocular allergy (OA). RECENT FINDINGS: During the last year many doctors and patients requested suggestions for the treatment of OA patients in COVID-19 time. Most of them were given by phone calls and emails following the recommendations given by Scientific Societies. SUMMARY: Considering the current multiple problems related to the COVID-19 pandemic, OA has not been considered a priority, even though patients need treatments. Topical antiallergic drugs are still the first option to treat all kind of OA, with the addition of topical corticosteroids in the severe forms of vernal and atopic keratoconjunctivitis (VKC and AKC) even in patients at risk of COVID-19. Topical immunomodulation is still recommended in severe forms of VKC and AKC unless the patient is infected. The number of patients treated with these drugs in our Center was similar than previous years. The risk to have a VKC patient affected by COVID-19 is similar to the general pediatric population but with a lower OR. In 2021, still in COVID-time, the management of OA should follow the previous recommendations with an update due to the risk of infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/therapy , Pandemics , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/drug therapy , Eye Diseases/therapy , Humans , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic
9.
Ital J Pediatr ; 46(1): 146, 2020 Oct 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-818113

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is ample evidence that COVID-19 is significantly less severe in children than in adults and asthma and allergy, the most common chronic disorders in children, are not included in the top 10 comorbidities related to COVID-19 fatalities. Nevertheless, concerns about asthma and allergy are still high.. In order to evaluate the impact of paediatric COVID-19 among Italian paediatricians, we sent a 20-questions anonymous internet-based survey to 250 Italian paediatricians with particular address to allergic symptoms and those affecting the upper airways. METHODS: The questionnaire was conceived and pretested in April 2020, by a working group of experts of the Italian Paediatric Society for Allergy and Immunology (SIAIP), and structured into different sections of 20 categorized and multiple choice questions. The first part included questions about epidemiological data follows by a second part assessing the way to manage a suspected COVID-19 infection and personal experiences about that. The third part concerned questions about patients' clinical characteristics and clinical manifestations. The survey was emailed once between April and mid-May 2020. RESULTS: A total 99 participants had participated in our survey and provided responses to our electronic questionnaire. The distribution of patients reported per month varies significantly according to the geographical area (P = 0.02). Data confirmed that in the North part of Italy the rate of patients referred is higher than in the rest of Italy. Almost all respondents (98%) reported caring for up to a maximum of 10 infected children and the last 2% more than twenty. Among these patients, according to the 75% of responders, a maximum rate of 20% were affected by allergic rhino-conjunctivitis and in particular in the North of Italy while in the Centre and in the South there was a higher incidence (P = 0.09). Almost the same applies for asthma, 83% of responders declared that up to a maximum of 20% of affected children were asthmatic, from 20 to 40% for the 13,5% of responders and from 40 to 60% for the last 3,5%. As for the allergic conjunctivitis also for asthma, we found a higher incidence in the Centre and in South than in the North (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to provide a comprehensive review of COVID-19 knowledge and impact among paediatricians in Italy about allergic asthma and upper airway involvement. From our point of view, it provides important information clearly useful for improving a good practice.


Subject(s)
Conjunctivitis, Allergic/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Rhinitis, Allergic/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Age Distribution , COVID-19 , Causality , Child , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pediatricians/statistics & numerical data , Pediatrics/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Rhinitis, Allergic/diagnosis , Risk Assessment , Sex Distribution , Societies, Medical
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL